[BXXPwg] proposal for 1:N interactions
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:59:02 -0600
>>> james woodyatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> 08/29/00 03:26PM >>>
>>This is nice if a session aborts so that it is know if the MSG was processed.
>Okay... but if it is "nice to know" that the MSG was processed, is it
>still a 1:0 interaction at that point?
Thanks for the correction, I meant 'delivered' not 'processed'.
> + A peer sending a message may be uninterested in whether the
>message is ever received by the other peer or discarded by the
>transport or the network.
If a peer didn't care if the message was even delivered UDP might be a better choice since BXXP guarantees the delivery of the messages (see 2.5.2).