[BXXPwg] Agenda for 12/14 meeting
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:50:24 -0500
Whats the point of multicast mapping? Isn't this confusing BXXP semantically?
Doesn't BXXP rely on *a* peer talking to *a* peer? How can multiple peers
responding to a multicast MSG message keep frame sequence numbers coordinated,
for example (I can think of several other issues).
Or am I not understanding what you are proposing?
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 05:15:01PM -0800, Dan Li wrote:
> Are people interested in a multicast Beep mapping? (I'm, for one). E.g.,
> run Beep on top of PGM or single source IP multicast. The application is
> for disseminating notifications to multiple sites. It doesn't have to be
> fully reliable but needs framing and sequencing.
> At 04:58 PM 11/30/00 -0800, Keith McCloghrie wrote:
> >I need to submit this to the IETF secretariat tomorrow, so below is
> >the prelimiary version of the Agenda for San Diego.
> >Gabe tells me that his notes won't be ready in time, and nobody else
> >has (yet) asked to speak, but we'll start with "Agenda bashing" to
> >accommodate late requests.
> > BEEP WG, Thursday 14 December, 1530-1730
> > Agenda
> > 1. Agenda bashing (5 minutes)
> > 2. WG status - Keith McCloghrie (5 minutes)
> > 3. Review of BEEP - Marshall Rose (45 minutes)
> > 4. Implementation Q&A - Marshall Rose (upto 65 minutes)
> >BXXPwg mailing list
> BXXPwg mailing list