[BEEPwg] BCP under consideration
Marshall T. Rose
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:10:18 -0700
> Since the specification in the internet draft says that "yyyy"
> is merely a unique string, it would appear that the variants above would
> all be permitted. However, I think it would make sense to explicitly
> state that elaboration to the right can be arbitrarily long and would
> indicate variants of the "yyyy" part.
how about this change:
Although the resulting URI must conform to the URI syntax, the "YYY"
portion is otherwise arbitrary. For example, it may contain a sub-
hierarchy (e.g., "epp/1.0").
might be assigned by the chairs of the "provreg" and "sacred" working