[BEEPwg] BCP under consideration

Marshall T. Rose mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:10:18 -0700

> Since the specification in the internet draft says that "yyyy"
> is merely a unique string, it would appear that the variants above would
> all be permitted. However, I think it would make sense to explicitly
> state that elaboration to the right can be arbitrarily long and would
> indicate variants of the "yyyy" part.

how about this change:

   Although the resulting URI must conform to the URI syntax, the "YYY"
   portion is otherwise arbitrary.  For example, it may contain a sub-
   hierarchy (e.g., "epp/1.0").

   For example,


   might be assigned by the chairs of the "provreg" and "sacred" working
   groups, respectively.