[BEEPwg] Channel response serialization

Greg Weber gdweber@cisco.com
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:57:43 -0400 (EDT)

> Greg Weber <gdweber@cisco.com> writes:
> > Would it be possible to use this beep extension mechanism
> > to negotiate the ability to send one-way messages (messages
> > that do not have any replies)?
> Certainly.  Is there some situation when this would be significantly
> better than MSG/NUL exchanges for you?

I was thinking of performance/traffic.  Lack of support for
one-way messages despite reliable transport seems to be often 
cited in support of work similar to beep, e.g.


> --Jered