[BEEPwg] Channel response serialization
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:13:38 -0700
On Friday, Aug 2, 2002, at 13:57 US/Pacific, Greg Weber wrote:
> I was thinking of performance/traffic. Lack of support for
> one-way messages despite reliable transport seems to be often
> cited in support of work similar to beep, e.g.
Here's my hipshot response to concerns about network overhead in BEEP:
we want tuning profiles for compression protocols. I can imagine a
compression protocol that squeezes a lot of bytes out of the BEEP
header and trailer, as well as shaving some off the encodings of the
management profile messages.
Since I don't have a deep compelling need to see such protocols
deployed, I'm not agitating loudly to contribute to their drafting.
You want to do that? Go for it. I will wait for you here.